§5 StAG Declaration
A 2021 statutory fix to pre-1975 gender discrimination in German citizenship transmission. Four categories of people may acquire German citizenship by filing a declaration — no Feststellung required, no fee, and no need for the parent or grandparent to have filed first.
Last verified: September 8, 2026 · Maintained by The Next Passport (Warner Creates LLC).
Deadline
August 19, 2031
§5 StAG declarations must be filed on or before August 19, 2031. Approximately 5 years remain as of today. After the deadline, the four statutory categories close — no extension has been announced. A declaration that arrives in time has already done its work: you acquire German citizenship on the day the declaration reaches the Bundesverwaltungsamt, and the certificate BVA issues later confirms that date. A declaration that arrives after the deadline does not lead to acquisition at all.
What stops the clock is receipt at the Bundesverwaltungsamt — not the postmark, and not lodgement at a consulate. The BVA is explicit that only timely arrival in Cologne counts, so a declaration handed to a consulate in the last weeks before August 19, 2031 can still miss the deadline while it is in transit. Do not plan to file close to the date.
This page is informational, not legal advice. §5 StAG categories are fact-specific. For guidance on your specific situation, consult a licensed German citizenship attorney. This information reflects the StAG as amended through 2026 and may not reflect subsequent amendments.
Background: why §5 exists
Until January 1, 1975, German citizenship law contained gender-based rules that stripped women of citizenship (or prevented them from transmitting it) in ways that would never have applied to men. Two rules did most of the harm: until April 1, 1953, a German woman lost citizenship automatically on marriage to a foreign man; until January 1, 1975, a child born in wedlock to a German mother and a foreign father did not inherit German citizenship — only the father's citizenship.
The Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) held that the second of those rules was incompatible with the equality of men and women under Art. 3(2) of the Basic Law in BVerfGE 37, 217, decided May 21, 1974 — which is why the law changed on January 1, 1975. That decision fixed the rule going forward; it did nothing for the people already born under it. Closing that gap took another five decades: the Viertes Gesetz zur Änderung des Staatsangehörigkeitsgesetzes added four declaration paths to §5 StAG with effect from August 20, 2021.
You will see the remedy dated to a 2020 Constitutional Court ruling in a number of places, including on an earlier version of this page. That is a different case, about the reach of the word “descendants” in Art. 116(2) of the Basic Law, and it is not the origin of §5.
This is also not the first attempt at the fix, which matters if an older relative tells you the family already tried. BVA publishes a list of historic declaration rights, and one of them covers “Eheliche Kinder deutscher Mütter, die zwischen dem 01.04.1953 und 31.12.1974 geboren sind” under Art. 3 of the 1974 amending act. Its filing window ran for the single calendar year 1977 and the right was abolished on 31 July 2006. If your parent missed that window, or was never told about it, the 2021 law is a fresh start rather than a second bite — and BVA says explicitly that a declaration refused as out of time in the past does not stop you declaring now.
The law set a 10-year filing window. The deadline — August 19, 2031 — falls 10 years after the amendment entered into force on August 20, 2021.
The four statutory categories of §5(1) StAG
§5(1) StAG enumerates four numbered items. Falling into one of them is the gateway to acquiring German citizenship by declaration, provided you were born after May 23, 1949 and none of the §5(2) exclusions applies. Item 1 covers two distinct variants — a German mother and a German father — which are set out separately below. Descendants of anyone in items 1–3 qualify independently under item 4. These are the same item numbers our eligibility check uses, so the two describe the same provisions.
One extension sits outside the four items and is easy to miss: §5(1) closes with a third sentence saying the declaration right exists equally where, on the same conditions, it was the Art. 116(1) Basic Law status — the standing of a German expellee or refugee of German ethnicity, rather than citizenship itself — that was never acquired or was lost. If your family's German standing came through that route, you are not outside §5 merely because no citizenship changed hands.
§5(1) item 1, first variant — In-wedlock children of German mothers (pre-1975)
Those born in wedlock between May 23, 1949 and January 1, 1975 to a German mother and a non-German father, who could not inherit the mother's citizenship under old law.
Until January 1, 1975, only the father's citizenship transmitted to children born in wedlock. A child born to a German mother and a non-German father acquired only the father's citizenship — the mother's German citizenship could not pass. This is the §5 route for descendants of German women who emigrated and married foreign nationals before 1975. The BVA's checklist asks for all four facts together: your birth inside that window, your mother German on the day of your birth, your father not German that day, and your parents married before your birth.
§5(1) item 1, second variant — Non-marital children of German fathers (pre-1993)
Those born out of wedlock to a German father between May 23, 1949 and July 1, 1993 whose paternity was established in time, but who still did not become German because the law of the day did not transmit from an unmarried German father.
BVA's checklist for this variant has five boxes — one more than the mother variant above — and all five have to be ticked: born after May 23, 1949 and before July 1, 1993; your mother not a German citizen on the day of your birth; your father a German citizen on that day; your parents not married to each other before 1 July 1998 — the condition most often dropped from summaries of this route, and the one that decides whether you need it at all, because a parental marriage before that date legitimised the child under the law then in force and conferred German citizenship directly; and paternity recognised, or proceedings to establish it started, before your 23rd birthday. The mother and father conditions are two separate rows on the form, not one combined row.
Read that last condition carefully, because it runs the opposite way from most people's expectation: the BVA requires that paternity was recognised, or that proceedings to establish it were started, before your 23rd birthday. This variant is for people who cleared that hurdle and were still excluded by the pre-1993 rule — not for people whose paternity was never established. If neither limb was met — no acknowledgement of paternity and no proceedings begun — before your 23rd birthday, §5 does not open. Note it is either limb, not both: proceedings STARTED in time still count even if they concluded later. It sits inside item 1 alongside the mother variant, not in item 2.
§5(1) item 2 — Mothers who lost citizenship by marriage before April 1, 1953
Those born after their German mother lost her own German citizenship by marrying a non-German man before April 1, 1953.
Until April 1, 1953, marriage to a foreign man automatically stripped a German woman of her citizenship. A child born after that marriage never acquired German citizenship, because the mother no longer held any to transmit. This is a loss-to-the-mother scenario, distinct from the item 1 transmission failure, and the cutoff date is April 1, 1953 — not the May 23, 1949 birth threshold discussed below. The marriage must also have come before your birth: a mother who married after you were born did not take your citizenship with her. BVA's checklist adds a fourth condition people forget — your father was not a German citizen on the day you were born either; if he was, you took German citizenship from him and there is nothing for item 2 to repair.
The April 1, 1953 date is not arbitrary and it is not in the StAG. It comes from Art. 117(1) of the Basic Law, which let law inconsistent with the equality of men and women under Art. 3(2) stay in force “but not beyond 31 March 1953”. That is the day the marriage-loss rule died, which is why the qualifying marriage has to be earlier.
§5(1) item 3 — Acquired-then-lost through legitimisation
Those born after May 23, 1949 and before April 1, 1953 to a German mother, who acquired German citizenship at birth and then lost it when their parents married.
A child born out of wedlock to a German mother inherited her citizenship. If the mother then married the child's non-German father, the marriage “legitimised” the child under the law of the time and moved the child onto the father's citizenship, extinguishing the German citizenship acquired at birth. Item 3 is narrow, and it is bounded on both sides: the BVA's checklist requires that you were born after May 23, 1949 and before April 1, 1953, and that the marriage happened after your birth but still before April 1, 1953. The checklist also asks that your father was not a German citizen on either date that matters — the day of your birth and the day he married your mother. Note the trigger is the marriage, not a modern acknowledgement of paternity on its own. BVA flags that the loss did not follow in every case, so a marriage inside the window is the question, not the answer.
§5(1) item 4 — Descendants of items 1, 2, or 3
Descendants of anyone in items 1, 2, or 3.
The statute says “Abkömmlinge der Kinder nach Nummer 1 bis 3” and attaches no generation cap. Critically, the parent or grandparent does not need to have filed their own §5 declaration before you file yours — each descendant may file independently, and the BVA assesses that ancestor's entitlement as part of your file rather than requiring a decision on theirs first.
One practical caveat worth raising with the BVA before you file if your qualifying ancestor is further back than a parent: the annex to the declaration form asks you to name the maßgeblicher Elternteil — the parent from whom you derive the claim — and to identify them as entitled under item 1, 2 or 3. The form is built around a one-generation step even though the statutory word is not.
Eligibility rule: you must have been born after May 23, 1949
Every §5(1) claimant must have been born after May 23, 1949 — the date the Basic Law was promulgated. It entered into force with the expiry of that day, under Art. 145(2) GG, so BVA dates the Art. 116(2) entitlement from May 24, 1949. §5(1) itself names no date — it says only “nach dem Inkrafttreten des Grundgesetzes”; the familiar “nach dem 23.05.1949” is BVA's gloss in its Merkblatt, not statutory text. This is the opening condition of §5(1) and it governs all four numbered items — including item 4. A descendant does not inherit an exemption from it: the BVA's own item 4 checklist opens with the same sentence it uses for items 1 to 3. The threshold is about your birth, and it is not the April 1, 1953 marriage cutoff in item 2.
In practice this rarely bites a descendant — anyone descended from a person born after May 23, 1949 was born later still. It matters at the other end of the chain: if the ancestor you are claiming through was born before that date, they are not a person entitled under items 1 to 3, and item 4 has nothing to attach to.
If the person the gate excludes once held German citizenship themselves, §13 StAG is the provision to read next. It is not a descent route and it is not §5 — it is naturalisation of a former German from abroad: “Ein ehemaliger Deutscher und seine minderjährigen Kinder, die ihren gewöhnlichen Aufenthalt im Ausland haben, können auf Antrag eingebürgert werden, wenn ihre Identität und Staatsangehörigkeit geklärt sind und sie die Voraussetzungen des § 8 Absatz 1 Nummer 1 und 2 erfüllen.” §13 borrows only two of §8(1)'s four conditions — legal capacity and no relevant criminal conviction. It does not ask for accommodation, for the means to support yourself, or for ties to Germany, and it carries the applicant's minor children with them. That reaches two of the people this page's own categories describe and §5 then shuts out on age: the woman who lost her German citizenship by marrying a non-German (item 2), and the person who lost it to a foreigner's legitimation (item 3) — both cohorts who, by the dates those items carry, were mostly born before the May 23, 1949 threshold. Where the loss was the marriage one, §38(3) Nr. 3 StAG makes that naturalisation free of charge: “Gebührenfrei sind: … 3. die Einbürgerung von ehemaligen Deutschen, die durch Eheschließung mit einem Ausländer die deutsche Staatsangehörigkeit verloren haben” — a fourth exemption in the same subsection as the §5, Art. 116(2) and §15 ones. §13 says “können”, so it is discretionary and confers no entitlement, and no authority publishes an approval rate for it. It does nothing for a descendant who was never German themselves; for that person the provision is §14 StAG, which is a harder test.
Who is excluded even when a category fits
Falling inside one of the four items is necessary, not sufficient. §5 StAG and the BVA's own checklist bar three groups. §5(2) bars anyone who held German citizenship again after the loss and then gave it up, renounced it or lost it a second time — and, by Nr. 1's closing words, anyone born OR ADOPTED as that person's descendant after that second loss («aber wieder aufgegeben oder verloren oder ausgeschlagen hat oder nach deren Aufgabe, Verlust oder Ausschlagung als dessen Abkömmling geboren oder als Kind angenommen worden ist»); and anyone caught by the §4(4) generation cut-off who could have acquired citizenship by registering a birth and did not — OR WHO STILL CAN, since §5(2) Nr. 2 reads «erwerben konnte, aber nicht erworben hat oder noch erwerben kann» and BVA repeats both limbs. Separately, §5(1) Satz 1 — not §5(2) — carries the criminal bar, and it has THREE grounds: a custodial sentence of two years or more for intentional offences, OR Sicherungsverwahrung ordered at the last final conviction, OR an exclusion ground under §11 StAG — «es sei denn, dass sie … verurteilt worden sind oder bei der letzten rechtskräftigen Verurteilung Sicherungsverwahrung angeordnet worden ist oder ein Ausschlussgrund nach § 11 vorliegt». §11 is a wider gate than a sentence length (extremism, a serious deportation interest, polygamy, disregard for equality of the sexes). Note the asymmetry rather than harmonising it: §15's parallel STATUTORY clause ends at Sicherungsverwahrung and has only two limbs, but BVA applies a §11 gate to §15 anyway — E15_Merkblatt §2.1 says «Verurteilungen … die Anordnung von Sicherungsverwahrung … oder das Vorliegen von Ausschlussgründen nach § 11 StAG können dem Erwerb … entgegenstehen». So do not tell a §15 applicant that §11 cannot reach them. BVA notes such sentences count even where imposed abroad.
The first bar is the one worth reading twice, because it turns on a second event rather than the original loss: an ancestor who was naturalised or re-naturalised as a German after the original loss and then gave that citizenship up again closes the route. §5(2) Nr. 1 then closes it for the next generation too — for a descendant “geboren oder als Kind angenommen” after that second loss, so an adoption after the loss is caught on the same footing as a birth.
The §4(4) bar has a limb that is easy to read as a closed door when it is not. §5(2) Nr. 2 bars anyone who could have acquired citizenship under §4(4) Satz 2 “aber nicht erworben hat oder noch erwerben kann” — or can still acquire it. BVA's own checklist repeats the words. If your child's one-year window under §36 of the Personenstandsgesetz is still open, §5 is shut to them because the registration is still available: file the birth registration, not a declaration.
And read the criminal bar as three grounds, not one. §5(1) Satz 1 closes the route where the declarant has been finally sentenced to a custodial or juvenile sentence of two years or more, where preventive detention (Sicherungsverwahrung) was ordered at the last final conviction, or where “ein Ausschlussgrund nach § 11” applies — §11 StAG covers, among other things, extremist activity and a particularly serious ground for expulsion. Convictions abroad count: BVA's checklist says “im In- und Ausland”. Separately, the same sentence requires you to be procedurally capable under §34 Satz 1 StAG — 16 or over — or legally represented.
The limb almost nobody publishes: §5(1) Satz 3
§5(1) does not stop at the four items. Its third sentence extends the same declaration right to people whose loss was of status rather than citizenship: “Das Erklärungsrecht nach Satz 1 besteht auch, wenn unter denselben Voraussetzungen die Rechtsstellung nach Artikel 116 Absatz 1 des Grundgesetzes nicht erworben worden oder verloren gegangen ist.”
Art. 116(1) of the Basic Law defines a second class of “German” that is not citizenship: a refugee or expellee of German ethnic origin admitted to the territory of the German Reich within its 31 December 1937 boundaries, and that person's spouse or descendants — Statusdeutsche. If the pre-1975 gender rules stopped that status passing down your line, on the same facts the four items describe, §5 is open to you as well. It is a narrow group, but the people in it are usually told they have no claim at all.
What §5 gives you that §4 does not
- •No German government fee under the §38(3) Nr. 4 StAG waiver — none of the €51-per-person fee the §4 Feststellung route charges each family member. It is not free of cost, though: BVA requires a current police certificate with a §5 declaration, which for a US applicant means an FBI Identity History Summary plus a federal authentication — about $38 per person that a §4 applicant does not pay. The honest comparison is roughly €32 against €51, not free against €51.
- •Filed by declaration, not by Feststellung — you are not proving you have always been German, you are claiming entitlement to a declared status. The evidentiary burden is lower than for §4.
- •No chain requirement — you do not need to prove that any intermediate ancestor held German citizenship continuously.
- •No generation cap under §5(1) item 4 — if an earlier ancestor qualifies, all descendants qualify independently.
- •No need for parent to file first — each descendant may file on their own.
- •The queue delays the proof, not the status — you become German on the day the declaration reaches the Bundesverwaltungsamt, and the certificate you receive later records that date. The BVA publishes no processing time for §5, and the wait is long, but it is a wait for the paperwork on a citizenship you already hold.
What you'll need
Ancestor's German records
Long-form German birth certificate (from the relevant Standesamt) establishing the ancestor was a German citizen at birth, and the document behind the loss or the failure to acquire: your parents' marriage certificate for item 1's mother variant, your mother's marriage certificate for item 2, the paternity recognition or paternity-proceedings record for item 1's father variant, and — for item 3 — your parents' marriage certificate showing a wedding after your birth and before April 1, 1953.
Chain records (for §5(1) item 4)
Long-form birth certificates for each generation linking you to the qualifying ancestor, plus any relevant marriage certificates for name changes. §5 does not require proving German citizenship for intermediate generations — but it does require proving it for the ancestor you claim through, and collect one generation further back than you would expect: the BVA first tests whether the parent you derive the claim from is itself entitled under items 1 to 3, using the details of that parent's own parents — so a descendant's file has to carry the grandparents' records too. BVA says it will come back for records on ancestors beyond that if the qualifying person's German citizenship cannot be shown from German documents directly.
Applicant's records
Your long-form birth certificate, passport or national ID, and — if applicable — marriage certificate.
Police certificate (frequently missed)
The BVA asks every declarant for a police certificate covering your whole country of residence, in the original, no more than six months old. For applicants in the United States that means an FBI Identity History Summary — a state-level background check is explicitly not accepted, because the certificate has to cover the whole country. Order it late rather than early: the six-month clock runs against you while the rest of the package is assembled.
Your certificate is not the only check. §5(1) Satz 2 applies §37 StAG to declarations, and §37 requires the citizenship authority to send the personal data of every applicant aged 16 or over to the domestic intelligence services (Verfassungsschutzbehörden) to screen for the §11 Satz 1 Nr. 1 and Nr. 2 exclusion grounds. BVA says so in its own words on the §5 route — “Auch eine Beteiligung des Verfassungsschutzes ist gesetzlich vorgeschrieben” — and lists it alongside its enquiries of other German authorities as a reason the wait is what it is. There is nothing to file for it and nothing you can do to speed it up.
Vordruck_EER
The §5 declaration form (Erklärung zum Erwerb der deutschen Staatsangehörigkeit), with Anlage_EER alongside it if you have no other citizenship case already open at the BVA, and Anlage_AV for further ancestors. You may send it to the BVA yourself or hand it to your nearest German mission, which forwards it — but remember that the deadline turns on receipt at the Bundesverwaltungsamt — not the postmark, and not lodgement at a consulate. All of this is the route for applicants living abroad, which is who the BVA Merkblatt is written for; if you live in Germany, BVA directs you to your local Staatsangehörigkeitsbehörde — the town or district administration — for the forms and the procedure instead.
Sworn translations — and the form the originals take
All non-German records must be translated by a sworn translator recognized by a German court; the BVA states that translations by non-sworn translators are not accepted. Separately, documents must be filed as originals or as copies certified by a notary, by the Standesamt that made the entry, or by a German authority — a plain photocopy is not enough, and a certification that only attests the translator's signature does not count. Copies have to show both sides of the certificate. Foreign civil-status documents generally also need legalisation or a Hague apostille. Send certified copies rather than originals wherever you can: BVA recommends exactly that, and says originals go back “upon special request after the process has been completed” — ask when you file, not afterwards.
See if §5 applies to your family
Our free eligibility check identifies which §5(1) item (if any) may apply to your family history — alongside §4 and Art. 116(2) analysis.
Start the free eligibility check →Not legal advice. §5 StAG categories are fact-specific and turn on precise historical dates. Consult a licensed German citizenship attorney before filing.